[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15874436#comment-15874436
]
Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-2422:
-----------------------------------------
[~dreamx], I am not sure if the fix is correct. Passing either
{{BinaryObject[]}} or {{BinaryObjectBuilder[]}} to builder should be
semantically equal to passing {{Object[]}} to normal object. As you set
component type ID to {{BInaryObject}} I suspect we will not be able to
deserialize root object correctly.
Let's add more tests ensuring that object can be deserialized into it's
original form after setting {{BinaryObjectBuilder[]}} to one of it's fields.
> Unable to deserialize BinaryObjectBuilder
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-2422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2422
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: binary
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
> Reporter: Denis Magda
> Assignee: Maksim Kozlov
> Labels: important
> Fix For: 2.0
>
> Attachments: ExampleNodeStartup.java
>
>
> Presently it's possible to serialize {{BinaryObjectBuilder}} but it will lead
> to the errors at deserialization stage.
> After a brief investigation I see that this happens because neither
> {{org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectBuilder}} nor
> {{org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.builder.BinaryObjectBuilderImpl}}
> presents in {{META-INF/classnames.properties}} file.
> If you try to update
> {{ignite/modules/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/classnames.properties}} by
> building the project from scratch and copying-pasting generated content from
> built {{classnames.properties}}, then you will still see that there are still
> no entries for {{org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectBuilder}} nor
> {org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.builder.BinaryObjectBuilderImpl}}.
> Looks like that {{ClassesGenerator}} misses these and other possible classes
> by some reason.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
