[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Mashenkov updated IGNITE-7832:
-------------------------------------
Description:
Steps to reproduce:
# Start 3 nodes with Partitioned cache with no backups.
Register event handlers for EVT_CACHE_REBALANCE_PART_DATA_LOST event.
PartitionLossPolicy should be smth other then IGNORED (which is default).
# Put some data and make sure rebalance is finished.
# Kill first node.
I observe partition lost events on 2-nd node only however, some of them should
be owned by 3-rd node according new topology.
Cache.lostPartitions() returns non-empty resultset on 2-nd node only.
# Kill 2-nd node.
No partition lost events will be fired on 3-rd node. However data is obviously
lost.
Cache.lostPartitions() returns empty resultset.
Looks like partition lost events mechanics is broken and should be fixed.
was:
Steps to reproduce:
# Start 3 nodes with Partitioned cache with no backups.
Register event handlers for EVT_CACHE_REBALANCE_PART_DATA_LOST event.
PartitionLossPolicy should be smth other then IGNORED (which is default).
# Put some data and make sure rebalance is finished.
# Kill first node.
I observer partition lost events on 2-nd node only however, some of them should
be owned by 3-rd node according new topology.
Cache.lostPartitions() returns non-empty resultset on 2-nd node only.
# Kill 2-nd node.
No partition lost events will be fired on 3-rd node. However data is obviously
lost.
Cache.lostPartitions() returns empty resultset.
Looks like partition lost events mechanics is broken and should be fixed.
> Partition lost events looks broken.
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-7832
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7832
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: cache
> Reporter: Andrew Mashenkov
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.5
>
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> # Start 3 nodes with Partitioned cache with no backups.
> Register event handlers for EVT_CACHE_REBALANCE_PART_DATA_LOST event.
> PartitionLossPolicy should be smth other then IGNORED (which is default).
> # Put some data and make sure rebalance is finished.
> # Kill first node.
> I observe partition lost events on 2-nd node only however, some of them
> should be owned by 3-rd node according new topology.
> Cache.lostPartitions() returns non-empty resultset on 2-nd node only.
> # Kill 2-nd node.
> No partition lost events will be fired on 3-rd node. However data is
> obviously lost.
> Cache.lostPartitions() returns empty resultset.
> Looks like partition lost events mechanics is broken and should be fixed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
