[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16500174#comment-16500174
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-8693:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user ilantukh opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4120

    IGNITE-8693 : Fix for SQL JOIN between REPLICATED and PARTITIONED caches

    …hes.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-8693

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4120.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #4120
    
----
commit 9b4ae6520c9c701382bc5468141c4b709658f682
Author: Ilya Lantukh <ilantukh@...>
Date:   2018-06-01T14:01:43Z

    ignite-8693 : Fix for SQL JOIN between REPLICATED and PARTITIONED caches.

----


> SQL JOIN between PARTITIONED and REPLICATED cache fails
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-8693
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8693
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ilya Lantukh
>            Assignee: Ilya Lantukh
>            Priority: Major
>
> One case of such problem is reproduced by 
> IgniteCacheQueryNodeRestartTxSelfTest.testRestarts (IGNITE-7766).
> If PARTITIONED cache has NodeFilter and is located on subset of REPLICATED 
> cache nodes, we might fail to execute SQL JOIN query with "Caches have 
> distinct sets of data nodes" error. Whether if will fail or not depends on 
> order of *cacheIds* List argument in 
> GridReduceQueryExecutor.stableDataNodes(...) - we will fail if first cacheId 
> is REPLICATED. The order depends on internal factors that are out of user's 
> control.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to