[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pavel Kovalenko updated IGNITE-9121:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
Currently, we use explicit synchronous future.get() when process messages from 
Communication SPI. This potentially may lead to deadlocks or thread-pool 
exhausting as was showed in IGNITE-9111 e.g.
To fix the problem we should determine all places in the code where we 
synchronously wait for some futures and try to either refactor these places or 
implement a special exception (which will contain such future) with subsequent 
retrying a runnable in low-level Communication SPI processing when future will 
be completed. 

  was:
Currently, we use explicit synchronous future.get() when process messages from 
Communication SPI. This potentially may lead to deadlocks to thread-pool 
exhausting as was showed in IGNITE-9111 e.g.
To fix the problem we should determine all places in the code where we 
synchronously wait for some futures and try to either refactor these places or 
implement a special exception (which will contain such future) with subsequent 
retrying a runnable in low-level Communication SPI processing when future will 
be completed. 


> Revisit future.get() usages when process message from Communication SPI
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-9121
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9121
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: cache
>    Affects Versions: 2.5, 2.6
>            Reporter: Pavel Kovalenko
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, we use explicit synchronous future.get() when process messages 
> from Communication SPI. This potentially may lead to deadlocks or thread-pool 
> exhausting as was showed in IGNITE-9111 e.g.
> To fix the problem we should determine all places in the code where we 
> synchronously wait for some futures and try to either refactor these places 
> or implement a special exception (which will contain such future) with 
> subsequent retrying a runnable in low-level Communication SPI processing when 
> future will be completed. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to