[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16637093#comment-16637093 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-9786: ---------------------------------------- GitHub user devozerov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4908 IGNITE-9786 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-9786 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4908.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #4908 ---- commit 9200568fb830c93c7d98c74c14d4006bbdac8797 Author: devozerov <vozerov@...> Date: 2018-10-03T14:37:59Z WIP. commit 88ef985156c42ffeef564b7a1a2a54e5efaa7989 Author: devozerov <vozerov@...> Date: 2018-10-03T15:41:59Z Done. ---- > MVCC: simplify TX wait list management > -------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-9786 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: mvcc > Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov > Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov > Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > It seems that instead of having a lot of classes and complex synchronization > mechanics for MvccProcessorImpl.waitMap, we can use single wrapper with a > list of waiters. > Resulting code will be much more simpler and less prone to concurrency issues. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)