[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16637372#comment-16637372
 ] 

Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-9228:
-----------------------------------------

[~stuartmacd], [~NIzhikov], [~dpavlov],
Igniters,
Any news on this ticket? Should we merge it or move to AI 2.8?

> Spark SQL Table Schema Specification
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-9228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9228
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: spark
>    Affects Versions: 2.6
>            Reporter: Stuart Macdonald
>            Assignee: Stuart Macdonald
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.7
>
>
> The Ignite Spark SQL interface currently takes just “table name” as a
> parameter which it uses to supply a Spark dataset with data from the
> underlying Ignite SQL table with that name.
> To do this it loops through each cache and finds the first one with the
> given table name [1]. This causes issues if there are multiple tables
> registered in different schema with the same table name as you can only
> access one of those from Spark. We could either:
> 1. Pass an extra parameter through the Ignite Spark data source which
> optionally specifies the schema name.
> 2. Support namespacing in the existing table name parameter, ie
> “schemaName.tableName”
> [1 
> ]https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/ca973ad99c6112160a305df05be9458e29f88307/modules/spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/ignite/spark/impl/package.scala#L119



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to