[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16656910#comment-16656910
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-5795:
----------------------------------------

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4852


> Binary metadata is not registered during start of cache
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-5795
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5795
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sql
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Dmitry Karachentsev
>            Assignee: Anton Kalashnikov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: usability
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> When cache configured with QueryEntity and used key type with 
> @AffinityKeyMapped field, it will be ignored and wrong partition calculated. 
> This happens because QueryEntity processing precedes key type registering in 
> binary meta cache. On that step 
> CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl#affinityKeyField called and unable to resolve 
> type, so null returned and null putted in affKeyFields.
> On next put/get operation CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl#affinityKeyField 
> will return null from affKeyFields, but should be affinity key field.
> Test that reproduces problem in [PR 
> 2330|https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2330]
> To wrorkaround the issue, set IgniteConfiguration#setKeyConfiguration(), it 
> will force registering key.
> *Root cause of this behaviour* is that in during cache registration 
> registration of metadata doesn't happen. It lead to exchange messages like 
> (MappingProposedMessage, MetadataRequestMessage etc.) which are often 
> redundant and also lead to behaviour described above(unhandled 
> AffinityKeyMapped).
> Main idea to fix this problem it is registration of metadata locally in 
> during cache start  on each node without messages exchange.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to