[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16672206#comment-16672206 ]
Roman Kondakov commented on IGNITE-9828: ---------------------------------------- [~vozerov], I made a fix for these issues: p.1, p.2, p.3, p.4, p.5 - done. p.6 - I made a solution described in p.4 - synchronous execution for small system pools, and parallel for the big ones. [~vozerov], [~gvvinblade], TC run is OK, please review. > MVCC: Continuous query failover. > -------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-9828 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9828 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: mvcc > Reporter: Roman Kondakov > Assignee: Roman Kondakov > Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.7 > > > We need to implement failover procedure for CQ with MVCC caches. Thoughts: > * CQ failover tests should be adopted for mvcc scenarios. See > {{IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite4}} > * We need to ensure the correctness of CQ and partition counters consistency > in cases when some of TX participants are in prepared state and others are > marked as rollback only. It looks like it doesn't work properly now. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)