[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16672206#comment-16672206
]
Roman Kondakov edited comment on IGNITE-9828 at 11/1/18 9:11 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~vozerov], I made a fix for these issues:
p.1, p.2, p.3, p.4, p.5 - done.
p.6 - I made a solution described in p.5 - synchronous execution for small
system pools, and parallel for the big ones.
[~vozerov], [~gvvinblade], TC run is OK, please review.
was (Author: rkondakov):
[~vozerov], I made a fix for these issues:
p.1, p.2, p.3, p.4, p.5 - done.
p.6 - I made a solution described in p.4 - synchronous execution for small
system pools, and parallel for the big ones.
[~vozerov], [~gvvinblade], TC run is OK, please review.
> MVCC: Continuous query failover.
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-9828
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9828
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: mvcc
> Reporter: Roman Kondakov
> Assignee: Roman Kondakov
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7
>
>
> We need to implement failover procedure for CQ with MVCC caches. Thoughts:
> * CQ failover tests should be adopted for mvcc scenarios. See
> {{IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite4}}
> * We need to ensure the correctness of CQ and partition counters consistency
> in cases when some of TX participants are in prepared state and others are
> marked as rollback only. It looks like it doesn't work properly now.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
