[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16679937#comment-16679937
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-10047:
-----------------------------------------

GitHub user rkondakov opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5353

    IGNITE-10047: Wrong MVCC coordinator assignment when multiple nodes failed

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-10047

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5353.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #5353
    
----
commit 6c364e04d9ad8519035662852c496445d2900042
Author: rkondakov <kondakov87@...>
Date:   2018-10-31T14:23:24Z

    IGNITE-10047: Wrong coordinator assignment when two or more oldest nodes 
fail.

----


> MVCC: Wrong coordinator assignment when two oldest nodes fail.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-10047
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10047
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mvcc
>            Reporter: Roman Kondakov
>            Assignee: Roman Kondakov
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> Reproducer: 
> {{CacheContinuousQueryFailoverMvccTxSelfTest#testLeftPrimaryAndBackupNodes}}. 
> This test can sporadically hangs when topology is unstable.
> The problem here is when two oldest nodes A and B failed, other nodes elect B 
> node as a new coordinator despite it is down. This happens because the new 
> mvcc coordinator is assigned in  {{GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#init}} 
> method which is called only ones in case of multiple nodes fail 
> simultaneously. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to