[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16695716#comment-16695716 ]
Dmitry Melnichuk commented on IGNITE-10230: ------------------------------------------- This task partially duplicates IGNITE-10358. Please see the comment and pull request there. The code {code:python} cache.put(1, (1, [ (datetime.strptime('2018-10-31T19:43:34.264437', '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f'), 264437), (datetime.strptime('2018-10-31T19:43:34.264438', '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f'), 264438), ]), key_hint=IntObject, value_hint=CollectionObject) {code} should be rephrased as {code:python} cache.put(1, (1, [ ((datetime.strptime('2018-10-31T19:43:34.264437', '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f'), 264437), TimestampObject), ((datetime.strptime('2018-10-31T19:43:34.264438', '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f'), 264438), TimestampObject) ]), key_hint=IntObject, value_hint=CollectionObject) {code} This looks quite ugly, but {{Timestamp}} have no direct analog in Python standard data types. I feel that some clumsiness was inevitable. > Putting collection of timestamps fails on python thin client > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-10230 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10230 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: thin client > Affects Versions: 2.6 > Reporter: Pavel Petroshenko > Assignee: Dmitry Melnichuk > Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > Here's the test that fails: > https://gist.github.com/pilshchikov/7434805b7d95973afe600e1c0c83d17a -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)