[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Mashenkov updated IGNITE-10695:
--------------------------------------
    Description: 
Operation like putIfAbsent and replace now tries to transfer Predicate instance 
(filter) to remote node.
 # Predicates are transferred to remote node with each update.
 # Predicate should be transferred only for "replace" operation if certain 
entry provided, otherwise we should send a correct operation code and use 
corresponding static filter on remote side.
 # This change will break protocol compatibility. Should we bother about it?

Let's fix protocol and add tests.

  was:
Operation like putIfAbsent and replace now tries to transfer Predicate instance 
(filter) to remote node.
 # Almost all filters can't be serialized as they do not have assigned direct 
type.
 # Seems, we have no enough tests and we miss remote-call case for such 
operations.
 # Predicate should be transferred only for "replace" operation if certain 
entry provided, otherwise we should send a correct operation code and use 
corresponding static filter on remote side.
 # This change will break protocol compatibility. Should we bother about it?

Let's fix protocol and add tests.


> MVCC: Fix cache API conditional update operations.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-10695
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10695
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mvcc
>    Affects Versions: 2.7
>            Reporter: Andrew Mashenkov
>            Assignee: Andrew Mashenkov
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> Operation like putIfAbsent and replace now tries to transfer Predicate 
> instance (filter) to remote node.
>  # Predicates are transferred to remote node with each update.
>  # Predicate should be transferred only for "replace" operation if certain 
> entry provided, otherwise we should send a correct operation code and use 
> corresponding static filter on remote side.
>  # This change will break protocol compatibility. Should we bother about it?
> Let's fix protocol and add tests.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to