[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16726256#comment-16726256 ]
Eduard Shangareev commented on IGNITE-8911: ------------------------------------------- [~DmitriyGovorukhin], I don't think that statement in your first point is true. As I see, GridStripedReadWriteLock contains collections of java ReadWriteLock and it is all. > While cache is restarting it's possible to start new cache with this name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-8911 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8911 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Eduard Shangareev > Assignee: Eduard Shangareev > Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.8 > > > We have the state "restarting" for caches when we certainly now that these > caches would start at some moment in future. But we could start new cache > with the same name. > Plus, NPE is throwing when we try to get proxy for such caches (in > "restarting" state). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)