[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16759866#comment-16759866
 ] 

Igor Seliverstov commented on IGNITE-8841:
------------------------------------------

[~Pavlukhin]
1) Probably it makes sense, I left it like this not to change callers. Anyway 
we need  to do some cleanup of involved classes, I've planned it as a separate 
task.
2) This is a special case, there can be active queries which survived several 
exchanges and there was no coordinator (no applicable for a coordinator node 
filter nodes) before new node have joined. We need to track such queries too.

> MVCC TX: Read transactions remap when coordinator fails.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-8841
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8841
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mvcc, sql
>            Reporter: Roman Kondakov
>            Assignee: Igor Seliverstov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: failover
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> At the moment read transactions that don't acquire topology lock will be 
> forcibly rolled back on topology change as read tx can be in fly while 
> topology being change.
>  This is done to prevent having active transaction with stale snapshots on 
> new topology in cases of TX coordinator or Near node were lost.
>  
> It would be nice to remap it somehow until they locked a topology or at least 
> throw some meaningful exception to user.
>  For example, it is possible to obtain a new "write" mvcc version from the 
> new coordinator and use this version for all further writes while using "old" 
> version for reads. In this case we need to change visibility rules a little: 
> "old" version should see "own" updates made by "new" "write" version.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to