[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16876051#comment-16876051
 ] 

Ivan Pavlukhin commented on IGNITE-11907:
-----------------------------------------

I tried to get rid of old registration mechanism and keeping only one and use 
it for both discovery implementations but observed new test failures. It seems 
that old mechanism removal should be done more careful.

As a result I prepared a PR with changes aiming to allow further processing in 
case of missing classes in a CQ registration message.

> Registration of continuous query should fail if nodes don't have remote 
> filter class
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-11907
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11907
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.7
>            Reporter: Denis Mekhanikov
>            Assignee: Ivan Pavlukhin
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: 
> ContinuousQueryRemoteFilterMissingInClassPathSelfTest.java
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If one of data nodes doesn't have a remote filter class, then registration of 
> continuous queries should fail with an exception. Currently nodes fail 
> instead.
> Reproducer is attached: 
> [^ContinuousQueryRemoteFilterMissingInClassPathSelfTest.java]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to