[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16883842#comment-16883842
]
Ivan Pavlukhin commented on IGNITE-10973:
-----------------------------------------
[~ivanan.fed], so, it seems that different names are caused by
{{surefire-junit47}} dependency. And actually I do not see a reason against
using it as we have been using junit 4.11 for a while. And yes, I guess
{{@UseTechnicalNames}} can be related to junit5 tests only (examples here).
So, I suppose we should return to dev-list announcing at least following:
1. First junit5 tests are going to appear in master.
2. Change in test report naming will obsolete TC bot history.
By the way, what is the plan for dealing with junit4 {{@Parameterized}} and
{{@Rule}}. I suppose that we already have them used in several places.
> Migrate example module tests from Junit 4 to 5
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-10973
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10973
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Ivan Fedotov
> Assignee: Ivan Fedotov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: iep-30
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For more information refer parent task.
> Migrate from Junit 4 to 5 in the example module.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
