[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16908853#comment-16908853
]
Ivan Pavlukhin commented on IGNITE-12061:
-----------------------------------------
[~zstan], I left my comments on
[GitHub|https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6770#pullrequestreview-275803048].
Also we need to clarify one thing about "physical" indexes destroy. Is it
right that before this patch we did not clear index partition at all on index
drop? Do you know why was it so? If it is true we need to highlight that it is
not only about _index recreation with different inline size_.
> Silently fail while try to recreate already existing index with differ
> inline_size.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-12061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12061
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: sql
> Affects Versions: 2.5, 2.7, 2.7.5
> Reporter: Stanilovsky Evgeny
> Assignee: Stanilovsky Evgeny
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7.6
>
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> INLINE_SIZE differ from previous value is not correctly sets.
> 1. create index idx0(c1, c2)
> 2. drop idx0
> 3. create index idx0(c1, c2) inline_size 100;
> inline_size remains the same, in this case default = 10.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
