[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292587#comment-13292587
]
Brian Topping commented on KARAF-884:
-------------------------------------
Thanks for the comment Andreas, sorry I am just getting back to this now. I've
added KARAF-1530 that provides an integration test skeleton that will make
testing the plugin quite a bit easier. I think it will be far easier to debate
the pros and cons of this kind of change once that is applied!
> karaf-maven-plugin should more closely map to POMs
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KARAF-884
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-884
> Project: Karaf
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: karaf-tooling
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Brian Topping
> Fix For: 3.1.0
>
>
> If karaf-maven-plugin is run against a set of POMs, the output of a feature
> generated for a given project seems to be the transitive closure of the
> dependencies in the form of a <bundle> entry for each dependency of the
> project. This seems incorrect though. Consider if a parent project P builds
> A and B where A depends on X, B depends on A and Y. Currently, the feature
> for A will be a single bundle entry for X and the feature for B will be three
> bundle entries for A, X & Y.
> It seems to make more sense that the feature for B would actually be one
> <feature> entry for A and a <bundle> entry for Y. The <bundle> for X would
> be transitively found through the feature definition for A.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
