[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15277709#comment-15277709
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on KARAF-4523:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 0e8cfd9a97a54f26d7fea4f409768a538f36db1e in karaf's branch
refs/heads/karaf-4.0.x from [~tadayosi]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=karaf.git;h=0e8cfd9 ]
[KARAF-4523] JMXSecurityMBean bulk canInvoke should be robust even if bulkQuery
contains duplicate operations
This fix is based on the original patch by Grzegorz Grzybek
(cherry picked from commit 1fff0131967ac11b0a481f503fbc952f777fc30d)
> JMXSecurityMBean bulk canInvoke should be robust even if bulkQuery contains
> duplicate operations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KARAF-4523
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4523
> Project: Karaf
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: karaf-management
> Affects Versions: 4.0.5
> Reporter: Tadayoshi Sato
> Assignee: Freeman Fang
>
> {{JMXSecurityMBean#canInvoke(Map<String, List<String>>)}} method throws the
> following exception in the presence of duplicate operations in the
> {{bulkQuery}} parameter:
> {code}
> javax.management.openmbean.KeyAlreadyExistsException: Argument value's index,
> calculated according to this TabularData instance's tabularType, already
> refers to a value in this table.
> at
> javax.management.openmbean.TabularDataSupport.checkValueAndIndex(TabularDataSupport.java:898)
> at
> javax.management.openmbean.TabularDataSupport.internalPut(TabularDataSupport.java:358)
> at
> javax.management.openmbean.TabularDataSupport.put(TabularDataSupport.java:350)
> at
> org.apache.karaf.management.internal.JMXSecurityMBeanImpl.canInvoke(JMXSecurityMBeanImpl.java:102)
> ...
> {code}
> There is an improvement (KARAF-1300) that addressed a similar situlation in a
> different component, so why not make {{JMXSecurityMBean}} robust as well?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
