[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jean-Baptiste Onofré resolved KARAF-4664.
-----------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Cellar can stop bundles whereas it should not
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-4664
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4664
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cellar-bundle, cellar-features
>    Affects Versions: cellar-4.0.1
>            Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>             Fix For: cellar-4.0.2
>
>
> If we have a cluster of 2 nodes running, both with all the same bundles 
> deployed and activated. We stop the second node, then the first one. We start 
> the first node, wait until it is fully initialized, then start the second 
> one. The issue is that sometimes second node startup causes few bundles on 
> the first node to stop.
> My guess is that the second node, when joining the cluster, pushes its state 
> to the cluster while some of its bundles are still starting and in RESOLVED 
> state, which causes corresponding bundles on the first node to stop and stay 
> RESOLVED too. My hypothesis is supported by the fact that once I change the 
> "default.*.sync" options in the "org.apache.karaf.cellar.groups.cfg" from 
> "cluster" to "clusterOnly", the issue stops happening. However, I think we 
> still should support the "cluster" synchronization strategy if possible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to