[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17169203#comment-17169203
 ] 

Robert Varga commented on KARAF-6625:
-------------------------------------

[~djencks] thanks for the guidance. I use component factories to migrate away 
from blueprint/explicit Service Registry manipulations. Aside from 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6315 (which is probably just 
exposing our bug in a blueprint namespace handler), it has been a smooth ride. 
The way I see it, bnd should not be generating a requirement here if it does 
not generate a corresponding provider.

At any rate, this is not a Karaf bug, Karaf just happens to find it.

I have filed [https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/issues/4243] for follow up.

> feature:install fails for bundles with SCR Factory Components
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-6625
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6625
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: karaf
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.8
>            Reporter: Robert Varga
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Priority: Major
>
> This issue has been reported in the thread here: 
> [https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/karaf-user/201809.mbox/%3c224b2d59-43ca-f01c-ea77-b2f7ba2a7...@nanthrax.net%3e]
> If a bundle is created using stock maven-bundle-plugin (4.2.1), without 
> specifying:
> {noformat}
> <_dsannotations-options>norequirements</_dsannotations-options>{noformat}
> and is using Factory Components 
> ([https://osgi.org/specification/osgi.cmpn/7.0.0/service.component.html#d0e39673]
>  , but it works the same way for R6), it results in MANIFEST.MF containing:
> {noformat}
> Require-Capability: 
> osgi.service;filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.component.ComponentFactory)";effective:=active
> {noformat}
> This is not handled properly at feature:install time and resulting in:
> {noformat}
> karaf@root()> feature:install odl-mdsal-binding-runtime 
> org.apache.felix.resolver.reason.ReasonException: Unable to resolve root: 
> missing requirement [root] osgi.identity; 
> osgi.identity=odl-mdsal-binding-runtime; type=karaf.feature; 
> version="[6.0.0.SNAPSHOT,6.0.0.SNAPSHOT]"; 
> filter:="(&(osgi.identity=odl-mdsal-binding-runtime)(type=karaf.feature)(version>=6.0.0.SNAPSHOT)(version<=6.0.0.SNAPSHOT))"
>  [caused by: Unable to resolve odl-mdsal-binding-runtime/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT: 
> missing requirement [odl-mdsal-binding-runtime/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT] osgi.identity; 
> osgi.identity=org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding-runtime-osgi; type=osgi.bundle; 
> version="[6.0.0.SNAPSHOT,6.0.0.SNAPSHOT]"; resolution:=mandatory [caused by: 
> Unable to resolve org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding-runtime-osgi/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT: 
> missing requirement 
> [org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding-runtime-osgi/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT] osgi.service; 
> filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.component.ComponentFactory)"; 
> effective:=active]]
>         at 
> org.apache.felix.resolver.Candidates$MissingRequirementError.toException(Candidates.java:1343)
>         at 
> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.doResolve(ResolverImpl.java:392)
>         at 
> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.resolve(ResolverImpl.java:378)
>         at 
> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.resolve(ResolverImpl.java:332)
>         at 
> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.region.SubsystemResolver.resolve(SubsystemResolver.java:257)
>         at 
> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:393)
>         at 
> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.FeaturesServiceImpl.doProvision(FeaturesServiceImpl.java:1062)
>         at 
> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.FeaturesServiceImpl.lambda$doProvisionInThread$13(FeaturesServiceImpl.java:998)
>         at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
>         at 
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
>         at 
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
>         at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
> Caused by: org.apache.felix.resolver.reason.ReasonException: Unable to 
> resolve odl-mdsal-binding-runtime/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT: missing requirement 
> [odl-mdsal-binding-runtime/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT] osgi.identity; 
> osgi.identity=org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding-runtime-osgi; type=osgi.bundle; 
> version="[6.0.0.SNAPSHOT,6.0.0.SNAPSHOT]"; resolution:=mandatory [caused by: 
> Unable to resolve org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding-runtime-osgi/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT: 
> missing requirement 
> [org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding-runtime-osgi/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT] osgi.service; 
> filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.component.ComponentFactory)"; 
> effective:=active]
>         at 
> org.apache.felix.resolver.Candidates$MissingRequirementError.toException(Candidates.java:1343)
>         ... 12 more
> Caused by: org.apache.felix.resolver.reason.ReasonException: Unable to 
> resolve org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding-runtime-osgi/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT: missing 
> requirement [org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding-runtime-osgi/6.0.0.SNAPSHOT] 
> osgi.service; 
> filter:="(objectClass=org.osgi.service.component.ComponentFactory)"; 
> effective:=active
>         at 
> org.apache.felix.resolver.Candidates$MissingRequirementError.toException(Candidates.java:1343)
>         ... 13 more
> {noformat}
> Adding above _dsannotations-options supresses the manifest entry and 
> everything works as expected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to