[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17896867#comment-17896867
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on KARAF-5014:
---------------------------------------
jbonofre commented on PR #1863:
URL: https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/1863#issuecomment-2466141687
@stataru8 yes, historically, we use this "flag" in all group/role definition
(users, keys, ...). So, we can consider this as a breaking change for users (if
we remove the group prefix).
I wonder what's the best option:
1. Documenting clearly the group prefix (but I wonder if it's still useful
to have this prefix)
2. Remove the use of group prefix for Karaf 4.5.0 (as it's a breaking change)
Thoughts ?
> First role of group definition in users.properties missing
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KARAF-5014
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5014
> Project: Karaf
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: karaf
> Affects Versions: 4.0.4
> Reporter: Andre Schlegel-Tylla
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Priority: Major
>
> The first role of an group got lost in role list:
> {code}
> bpcadmin = {CRYPT}...{CRYPT},bpcadmin,_g_\:zauberer,_g_\:masterdata
> _g_\:masterdata = VAM-administrator,VAM_organization_12001,wosinddieweiteren
> _g_\:zauberer=erstefehlt,abracadabra,simsalabim,sesamoeffnedich,hexhex
> {code}
> The roles "VAM-administrator" and "erstefehlt" are not listet on user
> "bpcadmin".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
