[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16460050#comment-16460050
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on KUDU-2425:
-----------------------------------

Wonder if this is the same underlying issue as KUDU-2212 or something like it

> Flaky test rpc_server-test
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-2425
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2425
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: Test
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.0
>            Reporter: Hao Hao
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: rpc_server-test.txt
>
>
> While running on master branch, rpc_server-test failed with 'Check failed: 0 
> == rv (0 vs. 16)'. Attached the full log.
> {noformat}
> F0427 23:04:30.496054 497 mutex.cc:77] Check failed: 0 == rv (0 vs. 16) . 
> Device or resource busy
> *** Check failure stack trace: ***
> *** Aborted at 1524895470 (unix time) try "date -d @1524895470" if you are 
> using GNU date ***
> PC: @ 0x397f632625 (unknown)
> *** SIGABRT (@0x452000001f1) received by PID 497 (TID 0x7fa80ffef980) from 
> PID 497; stack trace: ***
>  @ 0x397fa0f710 (unknown) at ??:0
>  @ 0x397f632625 (unknown) at ??:0
>  @ 0x397f633e05 (unknown) at ??:0
>  @ 0x7fa8104c4a29 google::logging_fail() at ??:0
>  @ 0x7fa8104c631d google::LogMessage::Fail() at ??:0
>  @ 0x7fa8104c81dd google::LogMessage::SendToLog() at ??:0
>  @ 0x7fa8104c5e59 google::LogMessage::Flush() at ??:0
> F0427 23:04:30.496255 518 mutex.cc:83] Check failed: rv == 0 || rv == 16 . 
> Invalid argument. Owner tid: 0; Self tid: 7; To collect the owner stack 
> trace, enable the flag --debug_mutex_collect_stacktraceF0427 23:04:30.496286 
> 509 mutex.cc:83] Check failed: rv == 0 || rv == 16 . Invalid argument. Owner 
> tid: 0; Self tid: 8; To collect the owner stack trace, enable the flag 
> --debug_mutex_collect_stacktrace
> *** Check failure stack trace: ***
> {noformat} 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to