[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16917942#comment-16917942
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on KUDU-2932:
-----------------------------------

bq. kudu doesn't support data locality

What do you mean by that? I think it _does_ support data locality (Impala/Spark 
tasks are put on the same machine as the kudu tserver, usually).

bq. I think it's useful to support unix domain socket for computing 
engine(impala/spark) and storage engine(kudu) mixed deployment scenarios.

We actually did some work on this many years ago, and also tried using shared 
memory. The domain socket seemed to have a small improvement, but shared memory 
didn't seem to be worth the benefit. You can find some of the really old 
patches on gerrit: https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/957/

> Unix domain socket could speed up data transmission
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-2932
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2932
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: HeLifu
>            Priority: Major
>
> Right now, kudu doesn't support data locality. So, I think it's useful to 
> support unix domain socket for computing engine(impala/spark) and storage 
> engine(kudu) mixed deployment scenarios.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

Reply via email to