[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14733309#comment-14733309
]
Yerui Sun commented on KYLIN-957:
---------------------------------
Actually, we deployed kylin on our hbase cluster node, that's why I added
'kylin.hadoop.cluster.fs' in kylin.
The purpose of this patch is to support both two cases, deploying kylin on
hadoop cluster where hive and mr based on, or on hbase cluster. In one word,
making kylin could specify two cluster filesystem, independent from
'fs.defaultFS' in local core-site.xml totally.
Indeed, there're many places creating new Configuration, and I've go through
all codes to make sure creating Configuration with properly filesystem
property. Maybe I missed some places, and I'll continue to fix these issues.
How do you think about the above explaining, or have a better idea to support
these two cases ?
> Support HBase in a separate cluster
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: KYLIN-957
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-957
> Project: Kylin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: General
> Affects Versions: v0.7.2
> Reporter: Dayue Gao
> Assignee: Shaofeng SHI
> Labels: features
> Fix For: v1.1
>
> Attachments: KYLIN-957-0.7-staging-v2.patch,
> KYLIN-957-0.7-staging.patch
>
>
> Currently Kylin assumes that HBase is deployed in the same cluster where Hive
> tables resides, which is not necessarily the case.
> We should support Kylin to write cubes to HBase in another cluster.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
