[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17709813#comment-17709813
]
Larry McCay commented on LIVY-878:
----------------------------------
Sorry for the delay in responding here. [~dacort] - I think that if these PRs
are ready to go as is that we should get them in.
There seems to be an outstanding comment on 392 about test dependencies - we
can follow up for those separately.
Thoughts?
> Log4j upgrade for Livy 0.8.0 version
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: LIVY-878
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-878
> Project: Livy
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Tinu Jose
> Assignee: Damon Cortesi
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We are looking for an advise from you in context of the below mentioned issue:
>
> *A high severity vulnerability (CVE-2021-44228) impacting multiple versions
> of the Apache Log4j 2 utility was disclosed publicly via the project’s GitHub
> on December 9, 2021.*
> *The vulnerability impacts Apache Log4j 2 versions 2.0 to 2.14.1.*
>
> Apache Livy version 0.7.0 version is being used by our team for processing
> the spark jobs . It uses the Log4j 1.x.x. which is not having any continued
> support.
> We would like to upgrade the Log4j versions to the latest stable version
> 2.15 without having any impact on the installations .
>
> Could you please recommend the possible ways to do the upgrade .Please note ,
> we are not looking to upgrade the Livy version to 0.7.1 to resolve this issue
> .
> Our requirement is to retain the current installed version and configurations
> with only changes in the Log4j versions
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
