[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16952969#comment-16952969
]
Mikhail Khludnev edited comment on SOLR-13808 at 10/21/19 11:55 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. It seems like the plan is to
# -create \{!cache} query parser to hook it up by existing DSL. Caveat for
users is loosing scoring-.
# enable cache by default for \{!bool filter=... filter=..}
# make sure that it's sensitive for \{!cache=false} local param for enclosing
queries
I'm fine with it and patches are welcome.
was (Author: mkhludnev):
Ok. It seems like the plan is to
# create \{!cache} query parser to hook it up by existing DSL. Caveat for
users is loosing scoring.
# enable cache by default for \{!bool filter=... filter=..}
# make sure that it sensitive for \{!cache=false} local param for enclosing
queries
I'm fine with it and patches are welcome.
> Query DSL should let to cache filter
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13808
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13808
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Priority: Major
>
> Query DSL let to express Lucene BQ's filter
>
> {code:java}
> { query: {bool: { filter: {term: {f:name,query:"foo bar"}}} }}{code}
> However, it might easily catch the need in caching it in filter cache. This
> might rely on ExtensibleQuery and QParser:
> {code:java}
> { query: {bool: { filter: {term: {f:name,query:"foo bar", cache:true}}} }}
> {code}
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
