[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17152052#comment-17152052 ]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-9379: --------------------------------------- How about the Solr Block Cache used for HDFS? It could be moved to Lucene (as HDFS is going away anyways). > Directory based approach for index encryption > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-9379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9379 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Bruno Roustant > Assignee: Bruno Roustant > Priority: Major > Time Spent: 2h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > The goal is to provide optional encryption of the index, with a scope limited > to an encryptable Lucene Directory wrapper. > Encryption is at rest on disk, not in memory. > This simple approach should fit any Codec as it would be orthogonal, without > modifying APIs as much as possible. > Use a standard encryption method. Limit perf/memory impact as much as > possible. > Determine how callers provide encryption keys. They must not be stored on > disk. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org