[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17381942#comment-17381942
]
Mayya Sharipova commented on LUCENE-9334:
-----------------------------------------
[~jpountz] Thank for your feedback and clarifications, it makes sense.
I just need to modify a test
org.apache.lucene.facet.taxonomy.directory.TestBackwardsCompatibility::testCreateNewTaxonomy
that I disabled, as this test introduces new data structures, and I will be
closing this issue.
> Require consistency between data-structures on a per-field basis
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9334
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: main (9.0)
>
> Time Spent: 14.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Follow-up of
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r747de568afd7502008c45783b74cc3aeb31dab8aa60fcafaf65d5431%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E.
> We would like to start requiring consitency across data-structures on a
> per-field basis in order to make it easier to do the right thing by default:
> range queries can run faster if doc values are enabled, sorted queries can
> run faster if points by indexed, etc.
> This would be a big change, so it should be rolled out in a major.
> Strict validation is tricky to implement, but we should still implement
> best-effort validation:
> - Documents all use the same data-structures, e.g. it is illegal for a
> document to only enable points and another document to only enable doc values,
> - When possible, check whether values are consistent too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
