[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17400267#comment-17400267 ]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-9959: -------------------------------------- Since this issue is proving a bit controversial, and is currently half-baked with term vectors having a new API without threadlocals but not stored fields, let's revert changes that have been done until now in order not to block the Lucene 9.0 release ([~sokolov] sent an email to the dev list about releasing soon). > Can we remove threadlocals of stored fields and term vectors > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-9959 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9959 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Time Spent: 8h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > [~rmuir] suggested removing these threadlocals at > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/137#issuecomment-840111367. > These threadlocals are trappy if you manage many segments and threads within > the same JVM, or worse: non-fixed threadpools. The challenge is to keep the > API easy to use. > We could take advantage of 9.0 to change the stored fields API? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org