[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17402311#comment-17402311
 ] 

Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10033:
--------------------------------------

HI [~weizijun], just my opinion, but I think it would be really helpful to have 
benchmark results before digging into a PR. It sounds like you've found a nice 
compression ratio benefit in your use-cases without much "loss in speed," but 
quantifying this with the {{luceneutil}} benchmarks would be a great next step. 
I would suspect we'd see a significant impact to throughput and latency for 
certain types of queries, but having the data would tell us for sure. Thanks 
for your contribution!

> Encode doc values in smaller blocks of values, like postings
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10033
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10033
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This is a follow-up to the discussion on this thread: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7b757074d5f02874ce3a295b0007dff486bc10d08fb0b5e5a4ba72c5%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E.
> Our current approach for doc values uses large blocks of 16k values where 
> values can be decompressed independently, using DirectWriter/DirectReader. 
> This is a bit inefficient in some cases, e.g. a single outlier can grow the 
> number of bits per value for the entire block, we can't easily use run-length 
> compression, etc. Plus, it encourages using a different sub-class for every 
> compression technique, which puts pressure on the JVM.
> We'd like to move to an approach that would be more similar to postings with 
> smaller blocks (e.g. 128 values) whose values get all decompressed at once 
> (using SIMD instructions), with skip data within blocks in order to 
> efficiently skip to arbitrary doc IDs (or maybe still use jump tables as 
> today's doc values, and as discussed here for postings: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7c3cb7ab143fd4ecbc05c04064d10ef9fb50c5b4d6479b0f35732677%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to