[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17431160#comment-17431160
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10191:
--------------------------------------

do we really need these slower functions? IMO the dot product is already slow 
enough in java!

Being a lower-level library, and having to support backwards compatibility for 
a long time, I'd like us to consider keeping this stuff to a minimum. 
Precomputing stuff to support these functions seems like the wrong direction to 
me, I think they should be removed, and users should just use the dot product.

> Optimize vector functions by precomputing magnitudes
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10191
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Julie Tibshirani
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Both euclidean distance (L2 norm) and cosine similarity can be expressed in 
> terms of dot product and vector magnitudes:
>  * l2_norm(a, b) = ||a - b|| = sqrt(||a||^2 - 2(a . b) + ||b||^2)
>  * cosine(a, b) = a . b / ||a|| ||b||
> We could compute and store each vector's magnitude upfront while indexing, 
> and compute the query vector's magnitude once per query. Then we'd calculate 
> the distance using our (very optimized) dot product method, plus the 
> precomputed values.
> This is an exploratory issue: I haven't tested this out yet, so I'm not sure 
> how much it would help. I would at least expect it to help with cosine 
> similarity – several months ago we tried out similar ideas in Elasticsearch 
> and were able to get a nice boost in cosine performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to