[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17538891#comment-17538891
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10481:
---------------------------------------------

{quote}Hmm... some slightly disappointing results - although we saw great 
improvement with this change, that doesn't seem to persist with Lucene 9.1 
benchmarking that I'm trying to do right now. Possible that something else has 
taken care of this optimization in a different way.
{quote}
That's interesting ... I wonder what other change could've stolen this thunder?

> FacetsCollector does not need scores when not keeping them
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10481
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10481
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/facet
>            Reporter: Mike Drob
>            Assignee: Mike Drob
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 8.11.2, 9.2
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> FacetsCollector currently always specifies ScoreMode.COMPLETE, we could get 
> better performance by not requesting scores when we don't need them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to