[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16295740#comment-16295740
]
Himanshu Pandey commented on MADLIB-1181:
-----------------------------------------
[~iyerr3],
So if we implement it in a weighted average way, for Regression, can we say
this:
{code}
sum(weight * value )/sum(weights)
{code}
And for classification:
{code}
sum(weight * 1 ) /sum(weights)
{code}
where {code} weight = 1/distance {code}?
Or we will just take {code} sum(weight*value) {code} into consideration for
regression and {code}sum(weight * 1 ){code} for classification?
> Add an option for weighted average in k-NN
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MADLIB-1181
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1181
> Project: Apache MADlib
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: k-NN
> Reporter: Frank McQuillan
> Assignee: Himanshu Pandey
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: v1.14
>
>
> Follow on from
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1059
> (please see this JIRA for additional comments)
> MADlib does a simple average of the k-nearest neighbors to come up with the
> final value for classification and regression. Doing a weighted average
> instead
> might be a desirable functionality. The weighting for the average can be
> based on the
> distance of the k-nearest neighbors.
> We can probably provide an optional parameter to let users choose how the
> final
> score has to be computed (avg or weighted avg).
> This JIRA applies to classification and regression.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
