[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16071557#comment-16071557
 ] 

Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1264:
----------------------------------------

[~tlemeur]
What you changed in the branch? Because now I can reproduce the issue.
Can you checkout the old commit 5593bf560aa8d8ed900fb146176a39ad5b0e42af of 
Surefire and test your branch with that?
If this works then we have to go to HEAD commit by commit and find which one is 
wrong.
We should test Rik Smith's code on every commit of Surefire as well.
Use offline mode {{mvn -o test}} and don't let your local repository to be 
overridden by Maven Central.

> Some tests can be lost when running in parallel with parameterized tests
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SUREFIRE-1264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1264
>             Project: Maven Surefire
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Junit 4.7+ (parallel) support
>    Affects Versions: 2.19.1
>         Environment: Maven 3.3.9
> Java 1.8.0_45 (Oracle)
> System: OS X
> Reproduced on Linux too, with both OpenJDK 7 and Java 7 from Oracle.
>            Reporter: Jean-Luc Derrien
>            Assignee: Tibor Digana
>             Fix For: 2.20.1
>
>         Attachments: pom.xml
>
>
> Hello,
> It appears some tests can be lost when using the parallel mode with 
> parameterized tests. Here is a [small 
> project|https://github.com/jderrien/surefire-junit-tests/tree/simple-1] I've 
> used to try to reproduce the issue we have seen.
> This is not something that happens on every run, but it's quite frequent.
> With this loop, the problem should appear in less than 2 minutes, maybe on 
> the first run when (un)lucky:
> {code}
> time while true; do mvn clean test > last.log ; tail -25 last.log ; if [ 
> "$(grep -c 'Tests run: 12' last.log)" == "0" ]; then break; fi ; done
> {code}
> Normal run:
> {noformat}
> -------------------------------------------------------
>  T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running [p2]
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p2] - p2 - 
> sleeptime = 1 => start
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p2] - p2 - 
> sleeptime = 1 => stop
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p1] - p1 - 
> sleeptime = 2 => start
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p1] - p1 - 
> sleeptime = 2 => stop
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p0] - p0 - 
> sleeptime = 5 => start
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p0] - p0 - 
> sleeptime = 5 => stop
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.006 sec - 
> in [p2]
> Running [p2]
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.011 sec - 
> in [p2]
> Results :
> Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> {noformat}
> When tests have been lost (here one test lost according to the output):
> {noformat}
> -------------------------------------------------------
>  T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running [p2]
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p0] - p0 - 
> sleeptime = 5 => start
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p2] - p2 - 
> sleeptime = 1 => start
> com.appnexus.viewability.core.surefireJunitTests.ATest.methodA1[p1] - p1 - 
> sleeptime = 2 => start
> Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.007 sec - 
> in [p2]
> Running [p2]
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec - 
> in [p2]
> Results :
> Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> {noformat}
> Note: there are 3 test classes and 18 tests on the [master 
> branch|https://github.com/jderrien/surefire-junit-tests/tree/master] and it's 
> even more frequent/easy to reproduce.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to