[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16223392#comment-16223392
]
Alon Bar-Lev commented on MJAVADOC-400:
---------------------------------------
Hi,
What is the status of this?
I also bump into the problem when trying to create aggregation of javadoc in a
submodule and use mvn install target.
+ root
+ submodule1
(aggregate at phase install)
+ jar11
+ jar12
+ submodule2
(aggregate at phase install)
+ jar21
+ jar22
mvn clean install on the root aggregates the root and ignore phase execution on
submodules.
Change directory into submoduleX and running mvn install triggers the
aggregation, unexpected behaviour.
Please fix.
Thanks!
> aggregate-jar does nothing if called as part of a reactor build
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MJAVADOC-400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-400
> Project: Maven Javadoc Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.9.1
> Environment: Reproduced with Oracle Java 1.7.0_45, Maven 3.0.5. Also
> reproduced with Maven 3.2.2.
> Reporter: Philip Aston
> Attachments: MJAVADOC-400-maven-javadoc-plugin.patch
>
>
> The attached {{reproduction.tgz}} contains a multi-module project
> _com.repo:parent_, and two child modules, _com.repo:module_a_ and
> _com.repo:module_b_. _com.repo:module-a_ is a jar module that contains a Java
> class. _com.repo:module-b_ depends on _com.repo:module-a_ and has uses
> {{javadoc:aggregate-jar}} to create a javadoc attachment.
> If I change into the {{module_b}} directory and run {{mvn clean install}}, a
> {{com.repo:module-b:javadoc}} attachment is not created.
> However, if I run {{mvn clean install}} from the top level, a
> {{com.repo:module-b:javadoc}} attachment is *not* created. I believe this to
> be a bug.
> Running with -X shows that the aggregate-jar mojo is configured, but never
> executed.
> If I change to {{module-b}} and run with -X, I see an
> MultipleArtifactsNotFoundException, but it otherwise behaves as I would
> expect. This looks similar to the symptoms of MVN-4618.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
