[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17310570#comment-17310570
 ] 

Michael Osipov commented on MNG-7132:
-------------------------------------

I am aware of this for a long time, but did not start to work on. Fully agree 
on 1 and 2, though 2 is just {{::1}}. IPv6 does not have any local ranges 
anymore. There is also link-local which I need to check.
As for 3: I would only use {{localhost}} everything else is a user problem or 
try to rely on {{InetAdress}} if it is suitable.

> org.eclipse.aether.util.repository.DefaultMirrorSelector#isLocal does not 
> handle local host/ip
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-7132
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7132
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Priority: Minor
>
> DefaultMirrorSelector used in 
> org.apache.maven.internal.aether.DefaultRepositorySystemSessionFactory#newRepositorySession
>  does not implement isLocal properly - more exactly it only handles 2 
> particular cases whereas local can be way more numerous:
>  # ipv4 case: 127.x.y.z (test can be has 4 segments separated by a dot and 
> starts with 127.)
>  # ipv6 case: starts with 1 and ends with 0 (see 
> java.net.Inet6Address.Inet6AddressHolder#isLoopbackAddress)
>  # host case: not sure we want to handle it but except localhost hardcoded 
> string we could parse /etc/hosts (or windows specific location) too to 
> resolve the ip without going through InetAddress - see next point) and use 
> the ip with 1+2 rules.
> this can be implemented as string parsing (faster) or reusing 
> [java.net|http://java.net/].InetAddress#isLoopbackAddress (which can fallback 
> in some resolution which can be slow at startup but works better overall and 
> is easier).
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to