[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17613200#comment-17613200
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MRESOLVER-269:
------------------------------------------
michael-o commented on PR #199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/199#issuecomment-1265735368
> > Yet another question: It is worthwhile to enable it by default and add
checksums on the fly when they are present?
>
> This could be similar as "record" functionality is for remote repository
filter feature. Yes, it could be possible, but unsure is it worth it: the whole
idea of this is to get checksums for _other trusted source_ than remote...
ОК, let's put this aside.
> Allow more compact storage of provided checksums
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MRESOLVER-269
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-269
> Project: Maven Resolver
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Resolver
> Reporter: Rafael Winterhalter
> Assignee: Tamás Cservenák
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: resolver-next
>
>
> While the repository layout makes sense for storage outside of a project, it
> would be more convenient to store checksums in a single file (per algorithm)
> when keeping checksums along when storing these checksums within a project.
> This makes the storage easier to version control and avoids the overhead of
> storing a lot of files in version control what often creates some overhead.
> Ideally, Maven could support such files out of the box by shipping a provider
> for such files.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
