[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17737655#comment-17737655
 ] 

Tomas Langer commented on MNG-6877:
-----------------------------------

That is also not correct, is it? Plugin dependencies are to extend the features 
of the plugin, not to add annotations processors.

If that is a workaround for the reactor ordering, then I get it, and we can use 
it. But I do not see that as a solution of the problem

> Separate scope for annotation processing
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-6877
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6877
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Dependencies
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.3
>            Reporter: Stanislav Spiridonov
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hi, I know about annotationProcessorPaths of maven-compiler-plugin and it 
> works somehow, but with some limitations
>  #  dependencyManagement does not work for path elements (need to specify 
> version). workaround use variable
>  # if I have apt-processor as a part of the project (separate module) and use 
> it only in the maven-compiler-plugin configuration it has been built in the 
> last order, that brakes build
>  #  the maven-compiler-plugin can use only INSTALLED artifacts, not from a 
> reactor
>  
> Use the processor as a usual dependency is also not a case (even with 
> provided scope)
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to