[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17856506#comment-17856506
]
Michael Osipov commented on MJAVADOC-797:
-----------------------------------------
Please verify that this still does not occur with {{javadoc(1)}} is directly
invoked, then it is truly a bug in this plugin.
> Exclusion rules works differently for java8 and java11
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MJAVADOC-797
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-797
> Project: Maven Javadoc Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.7.0
> Reporter: Maksim Timonin
> Priority: Major
>
> The behavior of the "-excludePackageNames" differs for java8 and java11 in
> case of using an option "-subpackages".
> Reproducer is available in the PR:
> [1] [https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/289]
> There are possibly, 2 bugs:
> 1. Behavior for "excludePackageNames" is actually depends on whether the
> "subpackages" setting is specified or not - there are different patterns for
> exclusion used, see patterns in *JavadocUtil#getExcludedPackages* and
> *JavadocUtil#getIncludedFiles*
> 2. In case of using "subpackages" the scenario in the PR [1], the plugin
> prepares equal options for the javadoc util for both java versions. But
> actually the output for the javadoc util differs (depends on the java
> version). I'm not sure is it an expected behavior for the javadoc util, but
> I'd expect the maven-javadoc-plugin will adjust for different java versions
> and provides equal exclusion result.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
