XN137 commented on PR #3338: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/3338#issuecomment-4182314533
I agree that it's arguable what the exact behavior should be but assuming we take your viewpoint, then in the case with `rerunFailingTestsCount>0` it doesnt make sense to run the passing test methods repeatedly just because the (invisible) teardown was failing. another viewpoint could be: if i have a silly bug in my teardown logic i want to hear about, as it might mean we fail to clean up resources properly and cause issues with other tests later. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
