[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=177615#action_177615
 ] 

Anders Kr. Andersen commented on MNG-624:
-----------------------------------------

A solution could be just to accept this version fact in maven

And then add a command to update siblings with a trunk version number.

I sit with a large project where we have the same issue with <url>.
We want to make a site for each version == for each maven coordinate.

Here I have decided that trunk is called 
URL=http://my.site.server/sites/..../trunk
And the coresponding tagged versions is called 
URL=http://my.site.server/sites/..../tags/artifactId-vvvv

To deal with this I am going to make a pom-maintain-maven-plugin
And have this plugin being able to maintain, SITE-URL, parent version, 
repository URL, 

For a long time I was experimenting with expression-language. 
${project.version} or  ${my-url-path} etc
I ended up dropping the expression language solution

Because I actually also want to force some naming standard into the artifacts. 
Many fields can be calculated by the projects location in the VCS etc.
I am thinking about some groovy stuff to express rules.


> automatic parent versioning
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-624
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-624
>             Project: Maven 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Inheritance and Interpolation
>            Reporter: Brett Porter
>            Assignee: Ralph Goers
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.x
>
>         Attachments: MNG-624-maven-2.0.x-r507648.patch, MNG-624-tests.tar.gz
>
>   Original Estimate: 4 hours
>  Remaining Estimate: 4 hours
>
> (this may be bumped to 2.1 or even made WON't FIX as it is contentious - see 
> MNG-521)
> currently, you have to specify the parent version when extending which makes 
> a project stand alone very easily, but has the drawback of being a 
> maintainance problem when you start development on a new version. Tools can 
> help, but it would be nice not to have to rely on them.
> One alternative is to allow the parent version to be omitted, and when it is 
> it is assumed you want the latest. The parent is used from the reactor or the 
> universal source directory. IT may also be read from a LATEST in the 
> repository though this is contentious - it may be better to simply fail in 
> that environment and require builds be in a known checkout structure for 
> building individual projects.
> This also introduces the need for tool support to populate the version on 
> release and deployment for reproducibility.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to