[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=198611#action_198611
]
Paul Benedict commented on MNG-4453:
------------------------------------
>> Second, I always subscribe to the theory that "closest" wins.
It's more than a theory. It's documented on Maven's web site it's the only
resolution strategy it currently supports.
> [regression] Plugin versions defined in a lifecycle mapping are not respected
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-4453
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4453
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Plugins and Lifecycle
> Affects Versions: 3.0-alpha-4
> Reporter: Benjamin Bentmann
>
> As reported by Sebastian Annies in [Using a specific plugin version in custom
> lifecycle|http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@maven.apache.org/msg82871.html],
> the plugin version given by a lifecycle mapping like
> {code:xml}
> <verify>org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin:2.1:jar-no-fork</verify>
> {code}
> is not respected by Maven 3.0, it's preferring the version from the plugin
> management of the super POM instead.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
