[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=348748#comment-348748
]
Karl-Heinz Marbaise commented on MNG-3397:
------------------------------------------
So an exclusions could look like this:
{code:xml}
<dependency groupId="junit" artifactId="junit" scope="test" version="4.11">
<exclusions>
<exclusion groupId="org.hamcrest" artifactId="hamcrest-core"/>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
{code}
Or going with the idea of Id's it would look like this:
{code:xml}
<dependency id="org.junit:junit:test:4.11">
<exclusions>
<exclusion id="org.hamcrest:hamcest-core"/>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
{code}
Furthermore some more convenience:
{code:xml}
<dependency id="org.junit:junit:test" exclusions="*"/>
{code}
Which brings me to a more formal definition:
{code:xml}
<dependency id="{groupId}:{artifactId}:{version}:{classifier}:{type}:{scope}"/>
{code}
> [RFC] change the POM to use attributes
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3397
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3397
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: FDPFC, POM
> Affects Versions: 2.0.8
> Reporter: Brett Porter
> Fix For: Issues to be reviewed for 4.x
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.6#6162)
