[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14681803#comment-14681803
 ] 

Qian Zhang edited comment on MESOS-3202 at 8/11/15 1:35 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I agree. [~alex-mesos], for quota, I think you mean the reservation for 
role which is set up when starting slave, right? And I think per-framework 
quota would be a useful feature (even per-framework weight), but the hard part 
is how to set up it since framework ID is on-demand generated during the 
framework registration.


was (Author: qianzhang):
Yes, I agree. ~alex-mesos, for quota, I think you mean the reservation for role 
which is set up when starting slave, right? And I think per-framework quota 
would be a useful feature (even per-framework weight), but the hard part is how 
to set up it since framework ID is on-demand generated during the framework 
registration.

> Avoid frameworks starving in DRF allocator.
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-3202
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3202
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Joerg Schad
>
> We currently run into issues with the DRF scheduler that frameworks do not 
> receive offers (see https://github.com/mesosphere/marathon/issues/1931 for 
> details). 
> Imagine that we have 10 frameworks and unallocated resources from a single 
> slave.
> Allocation interval is 1 sec, and refuse_seconds (i.e. the time for which a 
> declined resource is filtered) is 3 sec across all frameworks. 
> Allocator offers resources to framework 1 (according to DRF) which declines 
> the offer immediately. 
> In the next allocation interval framework 1 is skipped due to the declined 
> offer before. Hence the next framework 2 is offered the resources, which it 
> also declines.
> The same procedure in the next allocation interval (with framework 3). 
> In the next allocation interval the refuse_seconds for framework 1 are over, 
> and as it still has the lowest DRF share it gets the resource offered again, 
> which it again declines. And the cycle begins again....
> Framework 4 (which is actually waiting for this resource) is never offered 
> this resource.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to