[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15041352#comment-15041352 ]
Orlando Hohmeier commented on MESOS-4060: ----------------------------------------- Related Marathon Issue: https://github.com/mesosphere/marathon/issues/2755 > Memory Leak in Default Mesos UI > ------------------------------- > > Key: MESOS-4060 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4060 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Bug > Components: webui > Affects Versions: 0.25.0 > Environment: All > Reporter: John Omernik > > Basically, in using Firefox, I noticed that over time, my Firefox would get > to become unusable when I had Marathon and Mesos WebUIs up and running. At > first, I thought it was a function of my home (Mac) computer and Firefox. But > when I started a PoC for work, and my Windows install of Firefox had the same > issues, I started doing more investigation. > First of all, both at home and at work, my Firefox is only dedicated to > "cluster" related tasks. Thus, I don't have other tabs that are not Cluster > UIs. > My typical setup is to have MapR UI, Mesos UI, Marathon UI, Chronos UI, > Myriad UI, and Yarn UI all up and running. > After about 3-4 hours, my browser would get really slow, and non-responsive. > I'd kill all and start again. Rinse repeat. > So I did some analysis, and basically found a plugin for Firefox that shows > on each tab the amount of memory being used. I found that both Marathon and > Mesos UI were the culprits, and things got really bad after just 2-3 hours. > With those setup, on Windows, I have the following memory usage: > MapR UI: 7.7mb > Myriad UI: 9.8mb > Yarn: 2.7 mb > Chronos 10.2 mb > Marathon: 163 mb > Mesos UI: 463 mb > Both Marathon and Mesos continually climb, slowly, up some, down a few, up > some more, but obviously generally trending up. I guess I wanted to toss it > out here to see if it's something in my settings, or something that others > are seeing. It's a problem for me from a usability standpoint, and I am > guessing that it's one of those things that while not a priority for a > project, should be looked at. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)