[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15354394#comment-15354394
 ] 

Joseph Wu edited comment on MESOS-5740 at 6/29/16 2:27 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

|| Review || Summary ||
| https://reviews.apache.org/r/49174/ | Test-only libprocess hook |
| https://reviews.apache.org/r/49175/ | Tests + repro |
| https://reviews.apache.org/r/49177/ | Implement "relink" |


was (Author: kaysoky):
|| Review || Summary ||
| https://reviews.apache.org/r/49174/ | Test-only libprocess hook |
| https://reviews.apache.org/r/49175/ | Tests + repro |
| https://reviews.apache.org/r/49177/ | Implement "relink" |
| https://reviews.apache.org/r/49346/ | Network.hpp + relink |

> Consider adding `relink` functionality to libprocess
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-5740
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5740
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: libprocess
>            Reporter: Joseph Wu
>            Assignee: Joseph Wu
>              Labels: libprocess, mesosphere
>
> Currently we don't have the {{relink}} functionality in libprocess.  i.e. A 
> way to create a new persistent connection between actors, even if a 
> connection already exists. 
> This can benefit us in a couple of ways:
> - The application may have more information on the state of a connection than 
> libprocess does, as libprocess only checks if the connection is alive or not. 
>  For example, a linkee may accept a connection, then fork, pass the 
> connection to a child, and subsequently exit.  As the connection is still 
> active, libprocess may not detect the exit.
> - Sometimes, the {{ExitedEvent}} might be delayed or might be dropped due to 
> the remote instance being unavailable (e.g., partition, network 
> intermediaries not sending RST's etc). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to