[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15472146#comment-15472146
 ] 

Joseph Wu edited comment on MESOS-6136 at 9/7/16 11:40 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

Sounds like you're asking for:
a) A way to orphan tasks on purpose (e.g. [MESOS-4659]); or
b) The {{failover_timeout}} that the framework is supposed to set: 
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/3e52a107c4073778de9c14bf5fcdeb6e342821aa/include/mesos/mesos.proto#L229-L237


was (Author: kaysoky):
Sounds like you're asking for:
a) A way to orphan tasks on purpose; or
b) The {{failover_timeout}} that the framework is supposed to set: 
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/3e52a107c4073778de9c14bf5fcdeb6e342821aa/include/mesos/mesos.proto#L229-L237

> Duplicate framework id handling
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-6136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6136
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: 0.28.1
>         Environment: DCOS 1.7 Cloud Formation scripts
>            Reporter: Christopher Hunt
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: framework, lifecyclemanagement, task
>
> We have observed a situation where Mesos will kill tasks belonging to a 
> framework where that framework times out with the Mesos master for some 
> reason, perhaps even because of a network partition.
> While we can provide a long timeout so that Mesos will not kill a framework's 
> tasks for practical purposes, I'm wondering if there's an improvement where a 
> framework shouldn't be permitted to re-register for a given id (as now), but 
> Mesos doesn't also kill tasks? What I'm thinking is that Mesos could be 
> "told" by an operator that this condition should be cleared.
> IMHO frameworks should be the only entity requesting that tasks be killed 
> unless manually overridden by an operator.
> I'm flagging this as a critical improvement because a) the focus should be on 
> keeping tasks running in a system, and it isn't; and b) Mesos is working as 
> designed. 
> In summary I feel that Mesos is taking on a responsibility in killing tasks 
> where it shouldn't be.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to