[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16064820#comment-16064820
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1004:
----------------------------------------

Github user justinleet commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/624
  
    As a note, what I have is currently the first steps towards reusing infra.  
It's not perfect, and it's not reused across classes.
    
    There was an attempt to use the build matrix to split fast and slow tests, 
but it resulted in inconsistent failures.  Seems like Maven gets tangled up 
between the builds.  Could merit further investigation.  it'll increase 
processing time (because both unit and integration tests have to actually 
build), but should avoid having either portion of the build timeout.


> Travis CI - Job Exceeded Maximum Time Limit
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: METRON-1004
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1004
>             Project: Metron
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Nick Allen
>             Fix For: Next + 1
>
>
> Most Travis CI jobs are failing with the following error message.
> bq. The job exceeded the maximum time limit for jobs, and has been terminated.
> Travis apparently has a hard 50 minute limit that will cause jobs to timeout. 
>  
> https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build#Build-Timeouts
> There is some additional time for setting up the container that is counted in 
> this hard 50 minute limit that is not reported in the UI.  So even if a build 
> says it took 44 minutes with a timeout, it likely in fact did hit the 50 
> minute limit.
> Here are some examples of these failures.
> * https://travis-ci.org/apache/metron/builds/244574987
> * https://travis-ci.org/apache/metron/builds/244552768
> * https://travis-ci.org/apache/metron/builds/241249480
> This is a separate issue from the "Storm slots didn't shut down" issue that 
> is tracked in a separate PR.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to