[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16477301#comment-16477301
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1544:
----------------------------------------

Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/1015
  
    In the latest, I removed the problematic test case.  There is no need to 
test the eviction policy of the underlying cache, which is effectively what is 
happening.  If anyone can find gaps in test coverage, please let me know.


> Flaky test: 
> org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest#testCaching
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: METRON-1544
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544
>             Project: Metron
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.4.3
>         Environment: #uname -a
> Linux 60a83dc7a2ce 4.4.0-112-generic #135-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 19 11:48:36 UTC 
> 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>            Reporter: Pravin Dsilva
>            Assignee: Nick Allen
>            Priority: Major
>
> command used: mvn test
> The test fails intermittently on master branch.
> {code:java}
> Running org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.054 sec <<< 
> FAILURE! - in org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest
> testCaching(org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest) 
> Time elapsed: 0.053 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<6> but was:<4>
>  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>  at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
>  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
>  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
>  at 
> org.apache.metron.stellar.common.CachingStellarProcessorTest.testCaching(CachingStellarProcessorTest.java:73)
>  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
>  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
>  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
>  at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to